Мобильная версияI'm using mkdocs & mkdocstring to build my documentation and including code examples in the docstrings. I'm also using doctest (via pytest --doctest-modules) to test all those examples.
Option 1 - format for documentation
If I format my docstring like this:
""" Recursively flattens a nested iterable (including strings!) and returns all elements in order left to right. Examples: -------- ``` >>> [x for x in flatten([1,2,[3,4,[5],6],7,[8,9]])] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] ``` """ Then it renders nicely in the documentation but doctest fails with the error:
Expected: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] ``` Got: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] That makes sense as doctest treats everything until a blank line as expected output and aims to match is exactly
Option 2 - format for doctest
If I format the docstring for doctest without code blocks:
""" Recursively flattens a nested iterable (including strings!) and returns all elements in order left to right. Examples: -------- >>> [x for x in flatten([1,2,[3,4,[5],6],7,[8,9]])] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] """ then doctest passes but the documentation renders
[x for x in flatten([1,2,[3,4,[5],6],7,[8,9]])][1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Workaround? - add a blank line for doctest
If I format it with an extra blank line before the end of the codeblock:
""" Recursively flattens a nested iterable (including strings!) and returns all elements in order left to right. Examples: -------- ``` >>> [x for x in flatten([1,2,[3,4,[5],6],7,[8,9]])] [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] ``` """ Then doctest passes but
- there is a blank line at the bottom of the example in the documentation (ugly)
- I need to remember to add a blank line at the end of each example (error prone and annoying)
Does anyone know of a better solution?
Источник: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/780 ... for-mkdocs
